david schwartz xrp escrow - Ex-Ripple CTO Clarifies XRP Has No Issuer, Stolen Funds Cannot Be Clawed Back
Former Ripple CTO David Schwartz has again clarified that XRP has no issuer, and as such, victims cannot seek to clawback stolen funds.
Schwartz, who now assumesthe position of CTO emeritus at Ripple, recently disclosed this after a new “LP Reward Voucher” NFT scam drained funds from a major liquidity provider wallet, leading to speculationsabout whether the XRP Ledger’s clawback feature could help.

Key Points
- An XRPL-based project recently revealed that its second-largest liquidity provider fell victim to an XRP voucher scam.
- Some suggested using clawback to recover the stolen funds, but David Schwartz clarified that only an issuer can claw back an asset.
- Schwartz emphasized that XRP has no issuer, so no one can freeze or reverse stolen XRP.
- The XRPL activated Clawback in February 2024, and AMMClawback in January 2025, butthese features applyonly to issued tokens, not XRP.
- The recent scam tricks users into accepting unsolicited NFT sell offers that transfer their tokens in exchange for worthless NFTs.
XRP Community Facing New NFT Scam
For context, community member Apex589 first calledattention to the scam in a post on X. He warnedinvestors that theirproject’s second-largest liquidity provider had fallen victim to an XRPvoucher scam.Apex589 urged everyone to stay alert and refuse suspicious offers.

Soon after, the GTFXRP account shared more details, revealing that the affected address was a venture capital (VC) wallet. The account stressed that the space was becoming increasingly unsafe and asked whether someone could bring the issue directly to David Schwartz’s attention.
“XRP Has No Issuer”
Responding to these concerns, a community member asked ifthe Clawback feature could be usefulin this scenario.However, David Schwartz explained that only the issuer of a specific asset can claw it back. He then pointed out that XRP has no issuer, which means no one holds the authority to reverse or reclaim it.
Nope. Assets can only be clawed back by their issuer and XRP has no issuer.
— David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) February 13, 2026
Schwartz has made similar comments in the past. When another investor reported losing between 75,000 and 80,000 XRP to scammers last November and asked if the tokens could be frozen, Schwartz statedthat only an asset’s issuer can claw it back.
In April 2023, Schwartz explainedthat no person or company issues or redeems XRP. Notably, users do not need to trust any central party to use it. This is in contrast with every other asset on the XRP Ledger, which requires users to trust a specific issuer.
The Clawback Feature Does Not Affect XRP
For context, the XRPL community activated the Clawback amendment in February 2024. Thatfeature allowsissuers of tokens, such as stablecoins or other issued assets, to reclaim funds from trust lines in cases involving fraud, compliance, or operational mistakes.
On Jan. 30, 2025, the community activated the AMMClawback amendment, which allows tokens with clawback enabled to participate in automated market makers.
However, XRP does not fall under these rules. As the native asset of the XRP Ledger, XRP operates without an issuer. Because no issuer exists, no one can freeze it, reverse it, or claw it back.
Notably, an exploit in January 2024 confirmed this fact. Specifically, during this hack, Chris Larsen, Ripple’s co-founder and chairman, lostaround $150 million worth of XRP in a hack.
Despite Ripple’s position in the ecosystem and the activation of the Clawback amendment a month later, the company could notretrieve or freeze the stolen funds. The hacker kept control of the wallets even after the amendment went live. This also applies to the recent LP Reward Voucher scam.
How the LP Reward Voucher NFT Scam Works
For context, the new scam uses the XRP Ledger’s NFT broker mode to trick users. Specifically, scammers send unsolicited NFT selloffers that look likereward vouchers.Victims believe they are claiming a bonus or incentive.
In reality, the offer includes a pre-set payment in tokens in exchange for a worthless NFT. When the victim accepts the offer, the ledger executes the transaction exactly as written. The victim’s tokens, whether XRP, LP tokens, meme tokens, or any other asset, go straightto the scammer.
DisClamier:This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.
Source:Show originalDisclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.This detailed match analysis covers key moments, player performances, and tactical insights.
?? Key Statistics
Possession: 55% - 45%
Shots on target: 6 - 3
Pass accuracy: 88% - 82%
Corners: 5 - 2
?? Player Ratings
- Home MVP: John Doe (9.2)
- Away MVP: James Smith (8.7)
??? Post-Match Analysis
The manager praised the team's resilience after coming from behind. "We showed great character," he said.
This win moves them to the top of the league table with 45 points.
Final whistle analysis: The tactical shift in the second half proved decisive.